|
APHA Statement
|
|
American
Public Health Association Policy
Statement, Adopted October
2001 Recognition and Support for Community Health Workers' Contributions to Meeting our Nation's Health Care Needs The
American Public Health Association, Being aware that the formal participation of
Community Health Workers (CHWs) in health and human services systems has been
documented in the United States since the 1950s,[i],[ii]
and that current estimates indicate more than 12,000
CHWs serving throughout the U.S. in a diverse array of cultural settings[iii],
in programs involving both volunteer and paid CHWs, utilizing many different
titles, including Lay Health Advocate, Promotor(a),
Outreach Educator, Community Health Representative, Peer Health Promoter,
and Community Health Outreach Worker; and, Knowing that the roles of CHWs vary greatly,
depending on the needs of the community being served, and that CHWs work in
clinics, homes, community centers, and the streets, successfully addressing some
of the most difficult health problems of our time, including the prevention of
HIV/AIDS;[iv]
the treatment of tuberculosis;[v]
helping pregnant and parenting women access early prenatal care;[vi],[vii]
promoting the timely use of immunization services;[viii]
increasing the utilization of cancer screening services;[ix],[x]
aiding families in managing childhood asthma;[xi]
and, detecting and preventing
lead poisoning;[xii]
and successfully building community capacity;[xiii],[xiv]
and Knowing that, due in part to their status as members
of the community in which they work, CHWs effectively bridge sociocultural
barriers between community members and the health care system;[xv],[xvi],[xvii]
and, Recognizing that CHWs, through the National Community
Health Advisor Study, identified seven core roles of their work,[xviii]
which are:
Understanding that while diversity and flexibility to
serve unique communities' needs are a strength of CHWs, the lack of a standard
definition of who CHWs are, also contributes to their lack of recognition; and, Understanding that, while individual CHWs are doing innovative work, the lack of
cohesion among CHW programs, linked to the varied settings and issues in which
CHWs work, and the instability of funding for CHW programs, tends to undermine
the ability of CHWs to achieve their full potential; and,
Knowing that while operating independently under
various funders’ mandates, CHWs have not easily shared such resources as
training curricula and evaluation methods, and that CHW evaluations are
frequently poorly designed and implemented due to limited funds, inadequate
skills, and the lack of time needed to show results, leading to difficulty
documenting the contributions CHWs make to improving health and utilization of
services; therefore, 1.
Urges all
health
and human service professionals to recognize the skills and unique
attributes that both volunteer and paid CHWs bring to their work; 2. Urges CHWs and their advocates to: (a) develop a definition of the roles
and functions of CHWs that clarifies the relationships to and distinctions from
other professionals in health and human services; and (b) work with the
Department of Labor to develop a definition of CHWs; 3. Encourages traditional and non-traditional
educational institutions to develop and support effective training curricula for CHWs and their supervisors
that link to defined core roles and competencies;. 4.Urges federal, state, local,
tribal public health and
aging agencies,
as well as private providers and payors to institute permanent funding
streams for CHWs; 5.Urges the U.S. Congress to recognize the work of
CHWs in meeting our most troubling health concerns and appropriate funds to
support CHWs; 6.Urges public health professionals to include CHWs in efforts to establish a public
health credentialing process; 7.Encourages national policy makers to support
meaningful evaluation of CHW programs, with CHWs leading such evaluation
efforts;
and, 8.Urges local, state, tribal and national CHW organizations and advocacy groups to join together with
CHWs at the helm, to promote visibility of CHWs and create a unified voice for
the CHW field. Community
Health Worker SPIG
Footnotes: [i] Giblin PT. Effective Utilization and Evaluation of Indigenous Health Care Workers. Public Health Reports. 1989;104(4):361-368. [ii] Meister JS, Warrick LH, de Zapien JG, Wood AH. Using Lay Health Worker: Case Study of a Community-Based Prenatal Intervention. Journal of Community Health. 1992;17(1):37-51. [iii]
Rosenthal
EL,
Wiggins
N, Brownstein
JN, Johnson S, Borbon IA, Rael R.
The Final Report of the National Community Health Advisor Study. The
University of Arizona. 1998.
Personal
communication with the author of this Study indicates that this is a
significant underestimate of the number of CHWs working in the U.S. [iv] Birkel RC, Golaszewski T, Koman JJ, Singh BK, Catan V, Souply K. Findings from the Horizontes Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome Education Project: The Impact of Indigenous Outreach Workers as Change Agents for Injection Drug Users. Health Education Quarterly. 1993;20(4):523-538,. [v] Moore RD, Chaulk CP, Griffiths R, Calvalcante S, Chaisson RE. Cost-Effectiveness of Directly Observed Versus Self-Administered Therapy for Tuberculosis. American Journal of Respiratory Critical Care Medicine. 1996;154:1013-1019. [vi] McFarlane J, Fehir J. De Madres a Madres: A Community, Primary Health Care Program Based on Empowerment. Health Education Quarterly. 1994;21(3):381-399. [vii] Heins, HC, Nance, NW, Ferguson, JE. Social Support in Improving Perinatal Outcome: The Resource Mothers Program. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1987;70:263-266. [viii] Moore BJ, Morris DW, Burton B, Kilcrease DT. Measuring Effectiveness of Service Aides in Infant Immunization Surveillance Program in North Central Texas. American Journal of Public Health. 1981;71(6):634-636. [ix] Weinrich SP, Weinrich MC, Stromborg MF, Boyd MD, Weiss HL. Using Elderly Educators to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening. Gerontologist. 1993;33(4):491-496. [x] Whitman S, Lacey L, Ansell D, Dell J, Chen E, Phillips CW. An Intervention to Increase Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Low-Income African-American Women. Family and Community Health. 1994;17(1):56-63. [xi] Butz AM, Malveaux FJ, Eggleston P, Thompson L, Schneider S, Weeks K, Huss K, Murigande C, Rand CS. Use of Community Health Workers with Inner-city Children Who Have Asthma. Clinical Pediatrics. 1994;33(3):135-141. [xii] Sixteenth Street Community Health Center, Lead Screening Outreach Project, Milwaukee, WI; paper prepared for a conference sponsored by the Group Health Association of America, the American Managed Care and Review Association, and the Health Resources Services Administration. 1996. [xiii] Eng E, Young R. Lay Health Advisors as Community Change Agents. Family and Community Health. 1992;15(1):24-40. [xiv] Schulz AJ, Israel BA, Becker AB, Hollis RM. "It's a 24-Hour Thing…a Living-for-Each-Other Concept": Identity, Networks, and Community in an Urban Village Health Worker Project. Health Education and Behavior. 1997;24(4):465-480. [xv]
Witmer
A, Seifer SD, Finocchio L, Leslie J,
O'Neil EH. Community Health Workers: Integral Members of the Health Care
Work Force. American Journal of Public
Health.
1995;85(8):1055-1058. [xvi]
Love MB, Gardner K, Legion V. Community Health Workers: Who They Are and
What They Do. Health
Education and Behavior.
1997;24(4):510-522. [xvii]
Krieger J, Collier C, Song L, Martin D. Linking Community-Based Blood
Pressure Measurement to Clinical Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial
of Outreach and Tracking by Community Health Workers.
American Journal of Public Health.
1999;89(6):856-861. [xviii] Rosenthal EL, Wiggins N, Brownstein JN, Johnson S, Borbon IA, Rael R. The Final Report of the National Community Health Advisor Study. The University of Arizona. 1998 |